| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs i7-7700HQ


Description
Both models i5-7400 and i7-7700HQ are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
208.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
13k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
20.34k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.77k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
6.95k (x0.8)
TOTAL
45.52k
45.05k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-7400

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
52.7k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
89.69k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
22.49k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
4.3k (x0.54)
TOTAL
145.18k
169.17k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
23.27k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
20.35k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
4.76k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
7.92k (x1.23)
TOTAL
52.69k
56.29k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-7400

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
93.11k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
89.03k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
21.29k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
4.9k (x0.78)
TOTAL
173.7k
208.33k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i5-7400
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
4629 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4