| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs i5-9600KF


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 2.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906ec
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
371.08k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
16.92k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
25.44k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
6.36k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
13.25k (x1.52)
TOTAL
45.52k
61.97k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-7400

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
95.51k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
143.19k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
33.85k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
8.21k (x1.02)
TOTAL
145.18k
280.77k (x1.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
30.52k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
26.54k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
6.41k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
13.87k (x2.16)
TOTAL
52.69k
77.34k (x1.47)

Multithread

i5-7400

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
174.66k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
154.06k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
34.11k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
8.24k (x1.31)
TOTAL
173.7k
371.08k (x2.14)

Performance/W
i5-7400
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4