| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 237.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
237.55k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
15.12k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
23.4k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
10.9k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
9.41k (x1.08)
TOTAL
45.52k
58.83k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-7400

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
45.69k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
74.42k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
29.8k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
7.16k (x0.89)
TOTAL
145.18k
157.08k (x1.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
25.91k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
23.39k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
10.08k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
8.7k (x1.36)
TOTAL
52.69k
68.08k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-7400

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
94.51k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
99.21k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
33.35k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
10.47k (x1.67)
TOTAL
173.7k
237.55k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i5-7400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
3375 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
3543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
374 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
8484 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
6169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2401 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
2071 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
16210 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4