| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 84.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 6.5 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
15 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
11.96k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
10.73k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
4.59k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
4.31k (x0.95)
TOTAL
33.47k
31.6k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-7300U

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
218.24k (x8.64)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
206.92k (x5.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
100.37k (x8.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
11.45k (x1.96)
TOTAL
82.94k
536.99k (x6.47)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
10.55k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
10.02k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
3.66k (x0.72)
TOTAL
36.31k
28.23k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-7300U

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
215.04k (x8.48)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
230.43k (x5.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
96.87k (x9.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
8.76k (x1.62)
TOTAL
84.82k
551.1k (x6.5)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1691 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2896 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
708 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
5655 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2816 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4962 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
10376 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4