Core i5-7300U vs Pentium G3260
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
11.73k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
10.45k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
4.55k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
3.83k (x0.84)
TOTAL
33.47k
30.56k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-7300U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
22.99k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
20.53k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
8.82k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
6.55k (x1.12)
TOTAL
82.94k
58.89k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1684 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2707 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
750 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
389 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
5530 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2845 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1105 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1296 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
9563 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4