| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs Pentium 4415U


Description
Both models i5-7300U and 4415U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.5 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
56.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
2.34k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
9.51k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
3.05k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
2.59k (x0.52)
TOTAL
24.41k
17.49k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-7300U

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
4.71k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
21.73k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
7.35k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
2.43k (x0.44)
TOTAL
55.36k
36.22k (x0.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
8.29k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
11.82k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.09k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
4.18k (x0.92)
TOTAL
33.47k
27.39k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-7300U

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
17.24k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
27.4k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
7.44k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
4.31k (x0.74)
TOTAL
82.94k
56.39k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1684 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2707 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
750 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
389 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
5530 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2845 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1105 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1296 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
9563 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4