| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs Core 2 Duo E8500


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E8500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 2.7 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
1067a
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.167 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
January 2017
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
31.21k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
3.65k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
8.07k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.15k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
4.59k (x1.01)
TOTAL
33.47k
19.46k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-7300U

E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
7.11k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
15.79k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
6.2k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
2.13k (x0.36)
TOTAL
82.94k
31.21k (x0.38)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
1684 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2707 points/W
243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
750 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
389 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
5530 points/W
480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
2845 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1105 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1296 points/GHz
1450 points/GHz
TOTAL
9563 points/GHz
6144 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4