| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
4.05k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
15.29k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
9.04k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
10.54k (x2.13)
TOTAL
24.41k
38.92k (x1.59)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
9.05k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
33.88k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
15.34k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
6.74k (x1.22)
TOTAL
55.36k
65.01k (x1.17)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
7.07k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
10.55k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
5.27k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
5.66k (x1.25)
TOTAL
33.47k
28.56k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
25.28k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
37.48k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
17.77k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
6.92k (x1.19)
TOTAL
82.94k
87.45k (x1.05)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
13.9k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
20.13k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
9.41k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
10.59k (x2.07)
TOTAL
36.31k
54.03k (x1.49)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
55.4k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
59.01k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
22.83k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
6.7k (x1.24)
TOTAL
84.82k
143.94k (x1.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
25.53k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
19.99k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
9.31k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
10.81k (x2.06)
TOTAL
48.25k
65.64k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
58.46k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
57.31k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
20.1k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
6.81k (x1.2)
TOTAL
109.1k
142.69k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4