| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
3.88k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
14.98k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
9.7k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
8.6k (x1.73)
TOTAL
24.41k
37.15k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
14.61k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
54.9k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
27.58k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
5.04k (x0.91)
TOTAL
55.36k
102.13k (x1.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
12.89k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
18.55k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
9.93k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
9.54k (x2.1)
TOTAL
33.47k
50.91k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
50.06k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
66.1k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
20.24k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
5.51k (x0.95)
TOTAL
82.94k
141.91k (x1.71)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
13.58k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
19.53k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
9.37k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
9.23k (x1.8)
TOTAL
36.31k
51.7k (x1.42)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
56.25k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
73.73k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
29.56k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.39k (x1)
TOTAL
84.82k
164.94k (x1.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
21.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
17.71k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
7.92k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
8.24k (x1.57)
TOTAL
48.25k
55.37k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
73.03k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
68.19k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
24.89k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
5.54k (x0.97)
TOTAL
109.1k
171.65k (x1.57)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4