| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i3-10110U


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
4.26k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
15.48k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
4.94k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
4.31k (x0.87)
TOTAL
24.41k
28.98k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
7.41k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
29.18k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
10.26k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
3.27k (x0.59)
TOTAL
55.36k
50.13k (x0.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
14.3k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
20.09k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
5.23k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
4.24k (x0.94)
TOTAL
33.47k
43.87k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
25.51k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
41.33k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
10.81k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
3.21k (x0.55)
TOTAL
82.94k
80.85k (x0.97)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
14.25k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
21.55k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
5.16k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
4.26k (x0.83)
TOTAL
36.31k
45.22k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
26.15k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
44.03k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
10.71k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
3.28k (x0.61)
TOTAL
84.82k
84.17k (x0.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
24.6k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
22.32k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
5.02k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
4.7k (x0.89)
TOTAL
48.25k
56.64k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
47.98k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
44.28k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
10.33k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
3.98k (x0.7)
TOTAL
109.1k
106.58k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4