| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
3.78k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
16.42k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
4.75k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
5.51k (x1.11)
TOTAL
24.41k
30.46k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-7300U

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
15.18k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
74.87k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
27.85k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
6.08k (x1.1)
TOTAL
55.36k
123.97k (x2.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
13.72k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
22.93k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
4.99k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.27k (x1)
TOTAL
48.25k
46.91k (x0.97)

Multithread

i5-7300U

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
50.54k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
93.33k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
25.25k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
6.07k (x1.06)
TOTAL
109.1k
175.18k (x1.61)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4