Core i5-7300U vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
13.25k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
21.67k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
4.79k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
3.98k (x0.76)
TOTAL
48.25k
43.7k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-7300U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
46.47k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
78.38k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
16.69k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
3.3k (x0.58)
TOTAL
109.1k
144.84k (x1.33)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4