Core i5-7300U vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
13.75k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
22.58k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
4.99k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
3.55k (x0.68)
TOTAL
48.25k
44.87k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-7300U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
50.99k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
84.4k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
18.95k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
3.2k (x0.56)
TOTAL
109.1k
157.54k (x1.44)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4