| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i5-12400F


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3.7 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
90675
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
7.43k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
18.64k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
13.15k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
14.82k (x2.99)
TOTAL
24.41k
54.04k (x2.21)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
36.23k (x5.19)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
134.76k (x4.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
84.06k (x7.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
16.71k (x3.03)
TOTAL
55.36k
271.76k (x4.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
24.18k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
23.85k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
14.42k (x3.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
14.87k (x3.28)
TOTAL
33.47k
77.32k (x2.31)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
122.98k (x4.87)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
168.77k (x4.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
96.11k (x8.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
16.32k (x2.8)
TOTAL
82.94k
404.19k (x4.87)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
24.24k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
24.74k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
13.95k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
14.47k (x2.83)
TOTAL
36.31k
77.41k (x2.13)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
126.87k (x5)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
186.48k (x4.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
92.37k (x8.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
15.45k (x2.86)
TOTAL
84.82k
421.18k (x4.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
33.85k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
20.33k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
10.51k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
11.77k (x2.24)
TOTAL
48.25k
76.46k (x1.58)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
174.21k (x3.65)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
141.31k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
64.86k (x5.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
19.01k (x3.34)
TOTAL
109.1k
399.39k (x3.66)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4