| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.7 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906a4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
10240 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
6.95k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
16.28k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
10.49k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
9.95k (x2.01)
TOTAL
24.41k
43.67k (x1.79)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
14.97k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
51.01k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
30.47k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
8.59k (x1.56)
TOTAL
55.36k
105.05k (x1.9)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
20.87k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
20.74k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
11.32k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
8.32k (x1.83)
TOTAL
33.47k
61.26k (x1.83)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
45.12k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
60.59k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
28.48k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
14.06k (x2.41)
TOTAL
82.94k
148.26k (x1.79)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
15.63k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
20.2k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
9.94k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
8.06k (x1.58)
TOTAL
36.31k
53.83k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
35.72k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
56.41k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
25k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
12.48k (x2.31)
TOTAL
84.82k
129.6k (x1.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
37.56k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
21.13k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
11.35k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
10.31k (x1.96)
TOTAL
48.25k
80.34k (x1.67)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
73.97k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
72.37k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
29.61k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
9.65k (x1.69)
TOTAL
109.1k
185.6k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4