| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
3.75k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
17.22k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
9.79k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
8.21k (x1.66)
TOTAL
24.41k
38.97k (x1.6)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
9.19k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
35.47k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
19.14k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
5.82k (x1.06)
TOTAL
55.36k
69.62k (x1.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
12.9k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
21.4k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
10.73k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
8.16k (x1.8)
TOTAL
33.47k
53.19k (x1.59)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
30.31k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
45.13k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
20.17k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
5.77k (x0.99)
TOTAL
82.94k
101.38k (x1.22)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
14.65k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
21.57k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
9.93k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
8.02k (x1.57)
TOTAL
36.31k
54.18k (x1.49)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
32.14k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
43.54k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
19.58k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.61k (x1.04)
TOTAL
84.82k
100.87k (x1.19)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
24.25k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
21.63k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
9.09k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
7.23k (x1.38)
TOTAL
48.25k
62.19k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
56.9k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
55.68k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
19.29k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
6.09k (x1.07)
TOTAL
109.1k
137.96k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4