| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon W3530


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.8 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
72.77k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
7.51k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
4.93k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
3.02k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
2.74k (x0.35)
TOTAL
40.53k
18.2k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
31.33k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
23.11k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
15.78k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
2.55k (x0.33)
TOTAL
130.38k
72.77k (x0.56)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
986 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1390 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
347 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
2897 points/W
560 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4783 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2231 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
11581 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4