Core i5-7300HQ vs Pentium G4560
Description
Both models i5-7300HQ and G4560 are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.5 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.5 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
13.01k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
18.74k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.06k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
7.4k (x0.95)
TOTAL
40.53k
44.21k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
27.22k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
43.79k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
11.74k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
7.16k (x0.91)
TOTAL
130.38k
89.91k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
986 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1390 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
347 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
2897 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4783 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2231 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
11581 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4