Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-950
Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.7 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.7 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
76.29k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
8.01k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
5.38k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
3.11k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
2.96k (x0.38)
TOTAL
40.53k
19.46k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
31.53k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
24.16k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
15.84k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
4.75k (x0.61)
TOTAL
130.38k
76.29k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
986 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1390 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
347 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
2897 points/W
587 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4783 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2231 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
11581 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4