| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-9750H


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.7 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
286.43k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
25.93k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
22.84k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.11k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
11.46k (x1.38)
TOTAL
53.51k
65.33k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
130.68k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
119.91k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
28.76k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
7.08k (x0.91)
TOTAL
168.81k
286.43k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
6365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4