| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-8700k


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-8700k is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i7-8700k gets 443.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8700k is 2.6 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
80.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
443.77k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.13k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
16.96k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.56k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
12.85k (x1.45)
TOTAL
30.83k
39.5k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
24.01k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
108.69k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
36.62k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
9.33k (x1.04)
TOTAL
90.85k
178.64k (x1.97)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
12.92k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
20.68k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.3k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
12.59k (x1.61)
TOTAL
40.53k
51.48k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
94.26k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
152.55k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
39.74k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
8.53k (x1.09)
TOTAL
130.38k
295.07k (x2.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
16.87k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
26.12k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
6.33k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
13.71k (x1.74)
TOTAL
41.5k
63.03k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
105.74k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
180.52k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
44.99k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
8.51k (x1.06)
TOTAL
134.58k
339.77k (x2.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
31.2k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
27.82k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
6.57k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
15k (x1.81)
TOTAL
53.51k
80.6k (x1.51)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
202.42k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
186.33k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
44.96k (x2.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
10.05k (x1.29)
TOTAL
168.81k
443.77k (x2.63)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
1961 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
4671 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
3192 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
17148 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4