| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-2520M


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 134.6 k points while the i5-2520M gets 50.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 2.7 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
24.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
50.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
2.69k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
7.28k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
3.84k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
3.05k (x0.34)
TOTAL
30.83k
16.86k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
6.08k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
16.15k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
8.87k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
3.06k (x0.34)
TOTAL
90.85k
34.15k (x0.38)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
9.04k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
8.03k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.06k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
2.99k (x0.38)
TOTAL
41.5k
24.13k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
19.82k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
18.12k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
9.23k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
3.06k (x0.38)
TOTAL
134.58k
50.23k (x0.37)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
987 points/W
566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1500 points/W
518 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
324 points/W
264 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
179 points/W
88 points/W
TOTAL
2991 points/W
1435 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3310 points/GHz
2826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5112 points/GHz
2510 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1183 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2252 points/GHz
935 points/GHz
TOTAL
11857 points/GHz
7540 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4