| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
15.65k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
23.13k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.66k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
11.43k (x1.45)
TOTAL
41.5k
55.87k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
26.77k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
43.81k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
10.17k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
11.91k (x1.48)
TOTAL
134.58k
92.66k (x0.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
27.14k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
24.75k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.73k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
11.84k (x1.43)
TOTAL
53.51k
69.47k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
105.77k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
107.47k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
24.82k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.02k (x1.03)
TOTAL
168.81k
246.07k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4