| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i3-6100


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
506e3
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
112.28k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.81k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
15.65k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.14k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
4.28k (x0.48)
TOTAL
30.83k
28.89k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
7.75k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
37.33k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
12.13k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
3.56k (x0.4)
TOTAL
90.85k
60.77k (x0.67)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
13.76k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
19.96k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.44k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
4.4k (x0.56)
TOTAL
40.53k
43.55k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
28.99k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
45.75k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
12.72k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
3.68k (x0.47)
TOTAL
130.38k
91.14k (x0.7)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
13.78k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
21.21k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.2k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
3.73k (x0.47)
TOTAL
41.5k
43.92k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
29.02k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
49.55k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
12.3k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
3.28k (x0.41)
TOTAL
134.58k
94.15k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
22.89k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
21.04k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.9k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
4.01k (x0.48)
TOTAL
53.51k
52.84k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
50.05k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
47.13k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
11.38k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
3.72k (x0.48)
TOTAL
168.81k
112.28k (x0.67)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4