Core i5-7300HQ vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
10.08k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
10.11k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
4.06k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
2.36k (x0.3)
TOTAL
40.53k
26.6k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
36.86k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
38.51k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
15.17k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
2.72k (x0.35)
TOTAL
130.38k
93.26k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
986 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1390 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
347 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
2897 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4783 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2231 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
11581 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4