| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.8 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a20f12
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
814.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
22.6k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
24.85k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
11.25k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
24.8k (x2.99)
TOTAL
53.51k
83.5k (x1.56)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
258.21k (x3.35)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
342.24k (x4.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
155.3k (x10.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
59k (x7.58)
TOTAL
168.81k
814.74k (x4.83)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
7759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4