| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.31k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
17.51k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
10.53k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
23.57k (x2.66)
TOTAL
30.83k
55.92k (x1.81)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
24.18k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
117.98k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
70.96k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.08k (x0.9)
TOTAL
90.85k
221.19k (x2.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
20.37k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
22.52k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
10.18k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
21.49k (x2.59)
TOTAL
53.51k
74.56k (x1.39)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
144.01k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
191.86k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
84.53k (x5.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
6.5k (x0.83)
TOTAL
168.81k
426.9k (x2.53)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4