| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 7 3800XT


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 3 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
508.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
17.57k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
27.38k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
9.35k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
23.9k (x2.88)
TOTAL
53.51k
78.2k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
176.08k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
219.88k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
100k (x6.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
12.93k (x1.66)
TOTAL
168.81k
508.89k (x3.01)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
4847 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4