| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.6 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.25k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
19.72k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.84k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
21.36k (x2.41)
TOTAL
30.83k
51.17k (x1.66)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
35.04k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
181.42k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
64.86k (x3.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.21k (x0.91)
TOTAL
90.85k
289.54k (x3.19)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
15.22k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
24.12k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.87k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
21k (x2.69)
TOTAL
40.53k
66.21k (x1.63)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
126.81k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
229.86k (x3.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
61.74k (x3.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
9.77k (x1.24)
TOTAL
130.38k
428.19k (x3.28)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
14.44k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
24.92k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.8k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
19.07k (x2.42)
TOTAL
41.5k
64.24k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
122.01k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
220.34k (x3.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
59.89k (x4.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
9.9k (x1.23)
TOTAL
134.58k
412.13k (x3.06)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
15.61k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
26.08k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.84k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
18.34k (x2.21)
TOTAL
53.51k
65.87k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
123.33k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
240.46k (x3.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
61.23k (x4.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.17k (x1.05)
TOTAL
168.81k
433.19k (x2.57)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4