| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.4 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
410.47k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.14k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
19.07k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.77k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
18.28k (x2.06)
TOTAL
30.83k
47.26k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
34.48k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
169.65k (x3.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
63.68k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.2k (x0.91)
TOTAL
90.85k
276.01k (x3.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
15.11k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
23.46k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.64k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
17.52k (x2.22)
TOTAL
41.5k
61.72k (x1.49)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
119.5k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
198.79k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
59.75k (x4.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
11.58k (x1.44)
TOTAL
134.58k
389.62k (x2.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
15.02k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
24.26k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.53k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
16.26k (x1.96)
TOTAL
53.51k
61.07k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
122.92k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
220.32k (x3.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
59.78k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
7.44k (x0.96)
TOTAL
168.81k
410.47k (x2.43)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4