| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.8 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
13.02k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
20.56k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.81k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.43k (x0.65)
TOTAL
53.51k
43.82k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
27.29k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
49.37k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
13.57k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
5.61k (x0.72)
TOTAL
168.81k
95.84k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4