| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c2
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.57k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
17.21k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
9.97k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
14.98k (x1.69)
TOTAL
30.83k
46.75k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
12.75k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
45.98k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
27.86k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
20.06k (x2.24)
TOTAL
90.85k
106.66k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
30.89k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
25.57k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
10.64k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
15.66k (x1.89)
TOTAL
53.51k
82.77k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
96.34k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
95.75k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
32.29k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
15.2k (x1.95)
TOTAL
168.81k
239.58k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4