| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 237.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
237.55k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.75k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
17.28k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
9.5k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
8.81k (x0.99)
TOTAL
30.83k
39.34k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
12.43k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
54.95k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
26.41k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
7.38k (x0.82)
TOTAL
90.85k
101.16k (x1.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
13.43k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
22.29k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
11.18k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
9.75k (x1.25)
TOTAL
40.53k
56.64k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
40.24k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
65.99k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
28.51k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
6.66k (x0.85)
TOTAL
130.38k
141.4k (x1.08)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
15.12k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
23.4k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
10.9k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
9.41k (x1.19)
TOTAL
41.5k
58.83k (x1.42)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
45.69k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
74.42k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
29.8k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
7.16k (x0.89)
TOTAL
134.58k
157.08k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
25.91k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
23.39k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
10.08k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
8.7k (x1.05)
TOTAL
53.51k
68.08k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
94.51k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
99.21k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
33.35k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
10.47k (x1.35)
TOTAL
168.81k
237.55k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
3375 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
3543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
374 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
8484 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2401 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
2071 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
16210 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4