Core i5-7200U vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 75.9 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 75.9 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
206c2
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2016
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
11.39k
8.77k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
16.47k
5.82k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.36k
3.47k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
2.98k (x0.57)
TOTAL
37.43k
21.04k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-7200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
23.57k
53.23k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
39.35k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.15k
27.05k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
5.28k (x1.11)
TOTAL
75.9k
124.92k (x1.65)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1572 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
677 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5060 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3674 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5313 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1680 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
12073 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4