| | | | | | |

Core i5-7200U vs Xeon L5430


Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 75.9 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
1067a
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
51.64k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7200U
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
11.39k
3.09k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
16.47k
6.86k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.36k
2.66k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
3.01k (x0.58)
TOTAL
37.43k
15.62k (x0.42)

Multithread

i5-7200U

L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
23.57k
12.4k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
27.27k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.15k
10.41k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
1.57k (x0.33)
TOTAL
75.9k
51.64k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-7200U
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
1572 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
677 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
5060 points/W
1033 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
3674 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5313 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1680 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
12073 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4