Core i5-7200U vs i7-3770
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
133.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
12.55k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
12.11k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
4.69k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.25k (x1.1)
TOTAL
37.42k
34.59k (x0.92)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
49.56k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
56.21k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
22.17k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
5.75k (x1.22)
TOTAL
80.22k
133.7k (x1.67)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
1605 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2749 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
679 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
5348 points/W
1736 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3666 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1537 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
12072 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4