| | | | | | |

Core i5-7200U vs i5-9300H


Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.15k
3.38k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
12.84k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.6k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
6.23k (x1.2)
TOTAL
25.36k
27.05k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.28k
11.6k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
29.27k
48.01k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
17.05k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.71k
3.88k (x0.83)
TOTAL
49.56k
80.54k (x1.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
26.62k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
23.38k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
5.52k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
12.05k (x2.98)
TOTAL
44.94k
67.57k (x1.5)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
107.95k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
104.02k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
24.4k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
7.74k (x2.1)
TOTAL
97.52k
244.1k (x2.5)

Performance/W
i5-7200U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
5424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4