Core i5-7200U vs i5-8265U
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
806eb
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
24.32k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
20.35k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
4.38k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
8.52k (x2.11)
TOTAL
44.94k
57.57k (x1.28)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
65.17k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
63.6k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
14.4k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
6.31k (x1.72)
TOTAL
97.52k
149.48k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4