Core i5-7200U vs i5-3340M
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
11.51k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
11.13k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
4.4k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
4.55k (x0.95)
TOTAL
37.42k
31.58k (x0.84)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
22.59k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
25.49k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
10.42k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
4.25k (x0.9)
TOTAL
80.22k
62.75k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
1605 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2749 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
679 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5348 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3666 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1537 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
12072 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4