Core i5-7200U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.15k
4k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
14.19k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.62k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
11.03k (x2.12)
TOTAL
25.36k
33.84k (x1.33)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.28k
22.77k (x3.63)
Test#2 (FP)
29.27k
96.59k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
31.65k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.71k
2.45k (x0.52)
TOTAL
49.56k
153.46k (x3.1)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.39k
12.61k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
16.47k
17.94k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.36k
4.83k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
10.81k (x2.08)
TOTAL
37.43k
46.19k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.57k
74.62k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
119.63k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.15k
32.65k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
2.52k (x0.53)
TOTAL
75.9k
229.42k (x3.02)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
12.5k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
19.05k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
4.72k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
10.3k (x2.16)
TOTAL
37.42k
46.57k (x1.24)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
74.58k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
126.96k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
31.76k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
2.5k (x0.53)
TOTAL
80.22k
235.8k (x2.94)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
22k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
19.98k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
4.57k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
11.31k (x2.8)
TOTAL
44.94k
57.85k (x1.29)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
136.69k (x3.19)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
135.25k (x3.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
32.76k (x3.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
2.48k (x0.67)
TOTAL
97.52k
307.18k (x3.15)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4