| | | | | | |

Core i5-7200U vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.15k
4.05k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
15.29k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
9.04k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
10.54k (x2.02)
TOTAL
25.36k
38.92k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.28k
9.05k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
29.27k
33.88k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
15.34k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.71k
6.74k (x1.43)
TOTAL
49.56k
65.01k (x1.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.39k
7.07k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
16.47k
10.55k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.36k
5.27k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
5.66k (x1.09)
TOTAL
37.43k
28.56k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
23.57k
25.28k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
37.48k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.15k
17.77k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
6.92k (x1.45)
TOTAL
75.9k
87.45k (x1.15)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
13.9k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
20.13k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
9.41k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
10.59k (x2.22)
TOTAL
37.42k
54.03k (x1.44)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
55.4k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
59.01k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
22.83k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
6.7k (x1.42)
TOTAL
80.22k
143.94k (x1.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
25.53k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
19.99k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
9.31k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
10.81k (x2.67)
TOTAL
44.94k
65.64k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
58.46k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
57.31k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
20.1k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
6.81k (x1.85)
TOTAL
97.52k
142.69k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i5-7200U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4