| | | | | | |

Core i5-7200U vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
15.65k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
23.13k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
5.66k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
11.43k (x2.4)
TOTAL
37.42k
55.87k (x1.49)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
26.77k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
43.81k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
10.17k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
11.91k (x2.52)
TOTAL
80.22k
92.66k (x1.16)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
27.14k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
24.75k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
5.73k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
11.84k (x2.93)
TOTAL
44.94k
69.47k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
105.77k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
107.47k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
24.82k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
8.02k (x2.18)
TOTAL
97.52k
246.07k (x2.52)

Performance/W
i5-7200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4