| | | | | | |

Core i5-7200U vs i3-3120M


Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-3120M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i3-3120M gets 47.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-3120M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
22.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
47.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
7.92k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
7.96k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
3.09k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.15k (x0.66)
TOTAL
37.42k
22.12k (x0.59)

Multithread

i5-7200U

i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
16.82k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
19k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
7.7k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
4.25k (x0.9)
TOTAL
80.22k
47.78k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-7200U
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
1605 points/W
481 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2749 points/W
543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
679 points/W
220 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5348 points/W
1365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
3666 points/GHz
3169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
3182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1236 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1537 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
12072 points/GHz
8847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4