Core i5-7200U vs M-5Y10c
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
7.22k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
9.98k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
2.75k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
2.98k (x0.63)
TOTAL
37.42k
22.93k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-7200U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
15.07k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
24.8k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
6.68k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
4.46k (x0.94)
TOTAL
80.22k
51k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
1605 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2749 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
679 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
5348 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3666 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1537 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
12072 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4