Core i5-7200U vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
15.48k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
22.82k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
8.63k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
7.17k (x1.77)
TOTAL
44.94k
54.11k (x1.2)
Multithread
i5-7200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
117.98k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
146.43k (x3.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
65.54k (x6.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
4.77k (x1.3)
TOTAL
97.52k
334.72k (x3.43)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4