Core i5-7200U vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
11.13k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
19.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
4.47k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
3.87k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.94k
38.85k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-7200U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
17.13k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
30.56k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
9.44k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
4.09k (x1.11)
TOTAL
97.52k
61.23k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4