Core i5-7200U vs FX 9590
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
600f20
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7200U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
11.36k
11.51k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
9.57k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.03k
4.19k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
7.14k (x1.5)
TOTAL
37.42k
32.41k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-7200U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
24.08k
55.13k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
41.23k
51.69k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.19k
27.02k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.72k
3.81k (x0.81)
TOTAL
80.22k
137.65k (x1.72)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
1605 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2749 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
679 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
5348 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3666 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1537 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
12072 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4