| | | | | | |

Core i5-6600K vs i7-10750H


Description
The i5-6600K is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6600K gets a score of 209.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1 times faster than the i5-6600K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0652
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.28k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
209.28k points
349.21k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6600K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
16.71k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
26.5k
25.45k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.45k
6.06k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.09k
13.2k (x1.45)
TOTAL
59.28k
61.43k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-6600K

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
68.47k
67.59k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
105.05k
111.94k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.24k
27.7k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
5.3k (x0.5)
TOTAL
209.28k
212.53k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i5-6600K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
721 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1106 points/W
2487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
266 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
2203 points/W
4723 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6600K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4420 points/GHz
3342 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6795 points/GHz
5091 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1653 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
TOTAL
15199 points/GHz
12285 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4