| | | | | | |

Core i5-6600K vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The i5-6600K is based on Skylake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6600K gets a score of 209.3 k points while the 3900 gets 620.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i5-6600K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
870f10
Core
Skylake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2015
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.28k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
209.28k points
687.5k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
16.16k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.5k
23.75k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.45k
9.32k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.09k
23.17k (x2.55)
TOTAL
59.28k
72.4k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-6600K

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
68.47k
174.73k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
105.05k
275.63k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.24k
125.65k (x4.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
44.17k (x4.21)
TOTAL
209.28k
620.18k (x2.96)

Performance/W
i5-6600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
721 points/W
2688 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1106 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
266 points/W
1933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
680 points/W
TOTAL
2203 points/W
9541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4420 points/GHz
3758 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6795 points/GHz
5524 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1653 points/GHz
2167 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
5388 points/GHz
TOTAL
15199 points/GHz
16838 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4