Core i5-6600K vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-6600K is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6600K gets a score of 209.3 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6600K is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6600K gets a score of 209.3 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6600K is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.28k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
209.28k points
168.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6600K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
13.05k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.5k
22.88k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.45k
5.39k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.09k
7.31k (x0.8)
TOTAL
59.28k
48.63k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-6600K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
68.47k
51.73k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
105.05k
87.74k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.24k
20.74k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
6.57k (x0.63)
TOTAL
209.28k
166.79k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-6600K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
721 points/W
796 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1106 points/W
1350 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
266 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
2203 points/W
2566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6600K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4420 points/GHz
3262 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6795 points/GHz
5719 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1653 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
15199 points/GHz
12157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4